Developing a flight strategy to land heavier vehicles on Mars

Artist’s illustration of a spacecraft utilizing retropropulsion to guide.
Credit: NASA.

The heaviest car to effectively arrive at Mars is the Interest Rover at 1 metric load, about 2,200 pounds. Sending out more enthusiastic robotic objectives to the surface area of Mars, and ultimately people, will need landed payload masses in the 5- to 20- load variety. To do that, we require to find out how to land more mass. That was the objective of a current research study.

Typically, when a car goes into the Mars environment at hypersonic speeds of about Mach 30, it decreases rapidly, releases a parachute to decrease more then utilizes rocket engines or air bags to end up the landing.

” Sadly, parachute systems do not scale well with increasing car mass. The originality is to get rid of the parachute and usage bigger rocket engines for descent,” stated Zach Putnam, assistant teacher in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

According to Putnam, when the lander has actually slowed to about Mach 3, the retropropulsion engines are fired up, fired in the opposite instructions to slow the car down for a safe landing. The problem is, that burns a great deal of propellant. Propellant contributes to car mass, which can rapidly increase car expense and go beyond the existing launch ability here in the world. And every kg of propellant is a kg that can’t be payload: people, science instruments, freight, and so on

” When a car is flying hypersonically, prior to the rocket engines are fired, some lift is created and we can utilize that lift for steering,” Putnam stated. “If we move the center of mass so that it’s not evenly packaged, however much heavier on one side, it will fly at a various angle.”

Putnam discussed that the circulation around the car is various on the leading and the bottom which produces an imbalance, a pressure differential. Due to the fact that the lift remains in one instructions, it can be utilized to guide the car as it decreases through the environment.

” We have a specific quantity of control authority throughout entry, descent, and landing– that is, the capability to guide.” Putnam stated. “Hypersonically, the car can utilize lift to guide. When the descent engines are fired up, the engines have a specific quantity of propellant. You can fire engines in such a method that you land really properly, you can ignore precision and utilize everything to land the biggest spacecraft possible, or you can discover a balance in between.

” The concern is, if we understand we’re going to light the descent engines at, state, Mach 3, how should we guide the car aerodynamically in the hypersonic routine so that we utilize the minimum quantity of propellant and make the most of the mass of the payload that we can land?

” To make the most of the quantity of mass we can landing on the surface area, the elevation at which you spark your descent engines is necessary, however likewise the angle your speed vector makes with the horizon– how high you’re can be found in,” Putnam stated.

The research study clarified how to make the very best usage of the lift vector, utilizing optimum control methods to recognize control methods that can be utilized hypersonically throughout various interplanetary shipment conditions, car residential or commercial properties, and landed elevations to make the most of landed mass.

” Ends up, it is propellant-optimal to get in the environment with the lift vector pointed down so the car is diving. Then at simply the best minute based upon time or speed, switch to raise, so the car takes out and flies along at low elevation,” Putnam stated. “This makes it possible for the car to invest more time flying low where the climatic density is greater. This increases the drag, minimizing the quantity of energy that should be gotten rid of by the descent engines.”


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *